{"id":3274,"date":"2021-02-09T02:19:30","date_gmt":"2021-02-09T07:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navesinkinternational.com\/?p=3274"},"modified":"2023-12-20T02:53:23","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T07:53:23","slug":"how-to-compound-your-regulatory-problems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navesinkinternational.com\/2021\/02\/09\/how-to-compound-your-regulatory-problems\/","title":{"rendered":"How to compound your regulatory problems"},"content":{"rendered":"
Regulatory reports show that Credit Suisse has failed to investigate one of its private bankers despite many years of warnings. It is unfortunately not an isolated issue.<\/p>\n
Any firm has its share of bad apples, but Credit Suisse seems to be compounding legal and compliance issues.<\/p>\n
Here are the main facts of the story:<\/p>\n
The case naturally begs the question of why were warnings not investigated for so long.<\/p>\n
Now, Credit Suisse has a laundry list of legal issues these last few years:<\/p>\n
Here is my modest grain of salt. If you want to avoid always larger provisions<\/a> and profit warnings<\/a>, maybe you could avoid those legal issues in the first place? Maybe change the corporate culture? Just say’n.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Credits to Margot Patrick<\/a> at The Wall Street Journal.<\/a><\/p>\nCredits<\/span><\/h4>\n