{"id":2600,"date":"2020-11-03T22:35:48","date_gmt":"2020-11-04T03:35:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navesinkinternational.com\/?p=2600"},"modified":"2023-12-20T02:53:24","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T07:53:24","slug":"a-terrible-horrible-no-good-year-for-quants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navesinkinternational.com\/2020\/11\/03\/a-terrible-horrible-no-good-year-for-quants\/","title":{"rendered":"A terrible, horrible, no-good year for quants"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Two<\/p>\n

Quant hedge funds have had a bad year. One of their core factor, value, a staple of investment for many years, has strongly underperformed.<\/p>\n

Quants rely on backtests to see what has performed \/ is performing well. In a changing universe, models naturally have short lifetimes as a result. In this covid world, the past really doesn’t reflect the future anymore, and many models do not work at all. Some quants have self-doubt on the validity of their approach (see the previous post on Inigo Fraser Jenkins).<\/p>\n

It’s probably way too early to call for the demise of quant investing, but COVID surely brings a regime shift.<\/p>\n

Credits to\u00a0Robin Wigglesworth<\/a>at\u00a0Financial Times<\/a><\/p>\n