Home of the best experts

Crypto, News, Regulation, enforcement & litigation
By Gontran de Quillacq
On June 13, 2021

The first NFT class action is out

The Rosen Law Firm has filed the first NFT class action, which accuses Dapper Labs and the NBA of selling $500m of unregistered securities to US investors, as per the Howey test. The firm is also slow to pay back investors who sell their NFTs. The case will be followed closely by the new digital litigation industry.

Digital LawJeeun Friel vs. Dapper Labs and Roham Gharegozlou is the first NFT class action.

The lawsuit alleges that the NBA’s platform sold securities and did not respect securities law by doing so, while profiteering $500m in the process.

  • Dapper Labs made its name in 2017 by issuing the Crypto Kitties. These are programs, which allow their owners to breed and collect digital cats, is using the ‘Proof-of-Work” mining concept. It then released a new technology called “Proof-of-Stake” to reduce the computational impact of the technology. In 2019 Dapper Labs announced its cooperation with the National Basketball Association to launch a digital platform for the “NBA Top Shots” called “Moments”. It also issued the Flow cryptocurrency, which qualifies as a security according to its distribution mechanism (to US investors), but was not registered as such.
  • In April 2019, the SEC indicated that federal securities laws would apply to the sale of digital assets, if the Howey test is matched:

Owey Test (SEC)

  • Three months later, the NBA Top Shot platform minted various NBA events, in limited editions (up to 100 copies, or up to 1000 copies, or more copies, depending on the rarity segment), on the flow blockchain.
  • The assets  cannot trade away from Dapper Labs, which collects 5% of all future sales.
  • The Rosen Law Firm alleges that the assets meet the Howey test and are therefore securities:
    • The plaintiffs have exchanged money for a consideration worth of value.
    • Also the purchases consideration “derives their value from the success or failure of a given project, promoter, or start-up”.
  • Moreover, the defendants prevented investor from cashing out, because it is not helping owners to find new purchasers and even if they do, Dapper is not wiring cash back for weeks and months.
  • Interestingly, although the the plaintiff is in Virginia, the defendants is a Canadian corporation headquartered in Vancouver Canada, with an office and personnel in New York. The defendant is also the partner of the NBA, headquartered in NY. The geographies of the direct parties naturally opens questions about the jurisdiction of the venue.

The case will certainly be followed going forward.

 

You will find explanations on the nature of NFT in our article Non-Fungible Tokens, in Non Fungible Markets.

The suit was filed on 5/13/21 in NY County (653134/2021). The plaintiffs are represented by Philip Kim, Laurence Rosen and Michael Cohen at the Rosen Law firm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Regulation, enforcement & litigation
Investments & markets
"The algorithm decided" is not a legal defense. Neither is "we didn't know the system had drifted." Courts are settling these questions fast — and the...
Derivatives
Investments & markets
Prediction markets have outgrown their reputation as election novelties. They are now structured like financial derivatives, regulated by the CFTC, and generating the same market-abuse problems...
Investments & markets
Regulation, enforcement & litigation
A 10% stock drop on a single post. Here is how it became a $2.6 billion verdict....
News
Pyrite Risk Experts is look for a senior full-stack developer to deploy some of its technology....
Investments & markets
Regulation, enforcement & litigation
Litigation risk, disclosure, and instrument-level analysis during global shocks...
Derivatives
Investments & markets
Valuation Compression, AI-Capex Issuance, Basel III Incentives, and Private Credit Interconnectedness in 2026...
Skip to content