Home of the best experts

Navesink International provides undue risk-taking financial expert witness services in financial markets litigation and arbitration matters, evaluating whether risk decisions departed from mandate, governance, limits, or disclosed risk profile, supported by clear exhibits addressing foreseeability, causation, and damages.

Expert Witness Services for Undue Risk-Taking Allegations

In financial markets disputes, allegations of undue or excessive risk-taking frequently rely on hindsight, selective time frames, or misunderstandings about how risk was measured, approved, monitored, and communicated at the time decisions were made. An expert witness analysis provides Financial litigation support and reconstructs what was known, or reasonably knowable, at each relevant decision point and evaluates conduct against stated strategy objectives, mandate constraints, internal policies and limits, governance processes, applicable disclosures, and prevailing market practice.
Excessive or undisclosed risk may arise through leverage, concentration, tail exposure, liquidity and funding risk, convexity, basis risk, or hidden correlations within a portfolio.

Undue Risk Taking Financial Expert Witness

Our financial markets expert witness work examines whether these risks were properly identified, measured, monitored, escalated, and managed in practice, including whether limit breaches and exceptions were addressed appropriately and whether the actual risk profile aligned with what was represented to investors, counterparties, or supervisors.
We distinguish market-driven outcomes from avoidable losses linked to mandate drift, control or escalation failures, unsuitable exposures, valuation practices, financing and margin dynamics, and liquidation or de-risking decisions. Where appropriate, we quantify loss causation and damages under alternative feasible risk profiles consistent with the mandate and applicable constraints.

Expert Witness Methodology in Undue Risk Taking Matters

Reconstruct the decision record

Review policies, limits, committee materials, risk reports, valuations, financing and margin documentation, and key communications in the context of prevailing market conditions

Map exposures and embedded risks

Identify concentrations, leverage, optionality, correlation effects, liquidity pressures, and funding dynamics that contribute to tail outcomes.

Evaluate governance and controls

Assess authority structures, escalation procedures, exception handling, independence of oversight, model risk, and valuation controls.

Quantify and attribute outcomes

Break down P&L into identifiable drivers and stress scenarios, calibrated to the available data and market environment.

Assess feasible alternatives where appropriate:

Model risk profiles consistent with the mandate and constraints and quantify the impact of deviations.

Communicate findings for litigation

Present clear exhibits and a structured narrative supporting expert opinions on prudence, foreseeability, loss causation, and damages.

Representative Matters

Matter 1

SVXY options and margin liquidation

Matter type: Arbitration.

Facts:A retail trader was liquidated due to option losses realized in the last two hours of Volmaggedon day.

Instruments & Strategy: SVXY (short-volatility ETP), equity options on those VIX reverse ETFs.

Core Questions:

Loss causation, product complexity and foreseeability, suitability, supervision and margin methodology, and allocation of responsibility.

Our work: We performed a document and quantitative review focused on:

Outcome:

Provided a detailed report and exhibits supporting a defense narrative that the lack of supervisory and deficient margin practices materially contributed to the loss and to the inappropriateness of the broker’s claimed damages.

Related articles:

  • Don’t touch the VIX explains the non-normality of the VIX, and the mechanics of leveraged ETPs. (White paper)
  • Options on leveraged VIX ETFs – Legal Issues explain the high exoticity and toxicity of those ETPs, as well as the margin requirements for volatile customer portfolios. (White paper)
Matter 2

Allianz Structured Alpha

Matter type: Investigation and litigation support.

Facts: At the onset of COVID, in February and March 2020, equity markets fell rapidly as volatility spiked. Allianz Structured Alpha, a strategy marketed as market-neutral and volatility-neutral, reported significant losses tied to derivatives referencing the S&P 500 and volatility instruments. The episode raised questions about the strategy’s true exposures.

Instruments & Strategy: S&P 500 futures and options, VIX futures and options, and complex volatility strategies & risks.

Core Questions:

Strategy characterization, risk assessment, loss causation, and whether risk representations were consistent with the portfolio’s exposure.

Our work: After researching and finding the fund’s trading positions, we conducted an independent analysis focused on:

Outcome:

Plaintiff counsel retained us for follow-on work supporting claims tied to misrepresentation and risk governance deficiencies. The SEC later delivered criminal indictments against the firm and the money managers.

Related articles:

  • Losing your shirt, institutional style: Malachite’s strategy of ‘selling catastrophic risk insurance’ via derivatives, and its subsequent losses. (White paper)
  • Allianz Global Investors: Understand: Allianz Structured Alpha’s strategy, loss causation, and fraud by misrepresentation (White paper)

Litigation Deliverables in Undue Risk Taking Matters

These engagements result in clearly defined work products prepared for use in litigation and arbitration. Deliverables are structured according to the issues in dispute and the procedural posture of the matter.

Risk narrative and timeline:
Positions, market context, decision points, governance actions, and allocation of responsibilities.

Risk and limit analysis:
Limit breaches, exceptions, escalation processes, and materiality over time.

Stress and scenario exhibits:
Tail analysis, correlation and liquidity stress, margin practices, and funding dynamics.

Loss attribution and damages:
Decomposition of drivers, sensitivity analysis, and counterfactual assessment where appropriate.

Valuation and marks review:
Pricing conventions, reserves, and the impact of overrides.

Deposition and testimony support:
Preparation materials, demonstratives, and technical support if the matter proceeds.

Why Law Firms Choose Navesink for Undue Risk Taking Cases?

FAQs

An undue risk taking expert witness analyzes whether risk decisions departed from mandate, governance processes, internal limits, and disclosed risk profiles in financial markets litigation.
Loss causation is evaluated by reconstructing decision records, market conditions, and risk exposures to separate market-driven outcomes from avoidable losses.
Financial risks reviewed include leverage, concentration, tail exposure, liquidity and funding risk, convexity, basis risk, and hidden correlations.
Governance and supervision are assessed through review of policies, risk reports, escalation procedures, margin practices, and communications tied to market events.
Deliverables include expert reports, risk narratives, stress analysis, loss attribution, valuation review, and deposition and testimony support.
Skip to content